乐发彩票官网网址 - 乐发彩票邀请码

来源：乐发彩票客户端2024-03-28 17:48

乐发彩票官网网址

澳门广西青年联谊会会长：培养澳门青年家国情怀助其实现理想抱负******

　　中新网南宁1月16日电(杨陈陈沿佑)“我们非常重视对澳门青年的爱国主义教育及其身心发展，通过培养他们的家国情怀，凝聚青春力量，助力他们在奋斗中实现个人理想和抱负。”广西政协委员、澳门广西青年联谊会会长何凝莹此间表示。

　　1月11日至17日，广西“两会”在南宁举行。何凝莹在会期接受了中新网记者采访。

　　“青年是社会的未来栋梁。”自2019年当选澳门广西青年联谊会(以下称广青会)会长以来，何凝莹一直致力于开展有益青年成长的活动与交流合作，助力桂澳青年在社会不同领域发挥积极作用。“我希望能为青年做实事，为青年自身培养及事业发展添砖加瓦。”

　　何凝莹介绍，开展青年工作很重要一点，是要加强澳门青年的自身建设。2022年，广青会举办了“中共百年历史与‘一国两制’的关系”交流会，通过重温党提出“一国两制”方针和特区建立以及发展的历史，让澳门青年人了解党解决历史遗留问题的胆识、魄力和领导力，以及香港、澳门如何在党领导下走上最符合实际情况的发展道路，增强澳门青年的国家观念，培养其爱国爱党爱桂精神。

　　“我们希望在加强澳门青年自身建设的同时，加强提升青年对祖国的认同感、归属感和民族自豪感，树立为国家建设和‘一国两制’方针贡献力量的决心和信心，凝聚每一股青年力量。”何凝莹说。

　　为培养澳门青年的家国情怀，近年来，广青会多次组织澳门青年前往内地的红色教育基地及国家行政学院实地考察学习，让青年人深入了解祖国及党的发展历史和文化背景，培养正确的大局观。

　　在何凝莹看来，红色文化传承是铸牢中华民族共同体意识的重要因素。广青会组织澳门青年实地考察内地及广西经济发展情况及现代化建设，既可以帮助他们增广见闻，又提供了桂澳两地青年交流的平台，以便澳门青年挖掘共享内地发展机遇。

　　过去三年，受疫情影响全球经济下行，青年人对自身发展感到忧虑。“如今随着疫情逐渐开放，我们很希望能做些实际的青年工作。”何凝莹介绍，2023年，广青会将连同澳门广西社团联合总会和其他桂籍社团，重新启动“饮水思源”考察团，以大藤峡水利枢纽工程为切入点，让广大澳门青年认识该工程，了解祖国和广西对澳门社会的关怀与贡献，加深青年爱国情怀。与此同时，“饮水思源”考察团还将实地考察广西企业，寻找商机。

　　“澳门的经济在过去相对发展比较单一，特区政府正大力推动澳门经济适度多元发展。我们希望发挥广青会的平台作用，带动澳门青年到广西多交流、多学习，发掘合作机会。同时也希望可以引进广西的人才到澳门发展，携手推进桂澳两地经济社会持续高质量发展。”何凝莹说。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.